|
Summer 2000
For the Computer, Communications, and Controls Industries
Volume 16
In August 2000, Newton-Evans Research Company announced the publication of
its multivolume study of the U.S. and international electric utility markets for
substation equipment and instrumentation during the 2000 - 2004 frame. This
publication is entitled The Worldwide Market for Substation Automation and
Integration Programs in Electric Utilities: 2000-2004. This report series
includes the following publications:
Volume I - Survey of Substation Planning Officials in North America
Volume II - Substation Automation Programs: Case Studies from Eleven Major
Utilities
Volume III - Substation Equipment, Intelligent Electronics Devices, and
Communications Products and Services: Supplier Profiles
Volume IV - Survey of International Utility Substation Planning Officials
Volume V - World Outlook for Electric Utilities and Substation Automation:
Market Forecast and Assessment
Volume V contains detailed substation equipment and instrumentation spending
forecasts. Forecasts are provided for each major world region.
Also in Volume V are the overall tabulations of the responses from 78 North
American and 59 international utilities, representing 39 countries.
Statistical compilation in the report consists of summary tables and
cross-tabulations based on geographic location of respondents.
The following are some key findings from Volume V of this study.
On a worldwide basis, the most popular protocols currently in use include DNP
3.0-serial (32 percent) and Modbus Plus (25 percent). On a summary basis for
North American utilities, both DNP LAN (24 percent) and UCA2/MMS (22 percent)
led the way in mentions for planned use. Plans by international utilities to use
(or change) protocols in substation automation programs centered on DNP 3.0 LN
(15 percent) and also IEC 870-5 (13 percent).
Respondents were asked to rank the importance of "potential
obstacles" to implementing substation automation for new substations. None
of the nine listed potential obstacles on the survey were viewed as particularly
difficult to overcome. While there are some substantive differences between the
North American and international groups of respondents, on a summary basis, lack
of standard protocols, lack of perceived benefits, and lack of economic
justification were the key potential obstacles.
Currently, almost one-half (49 percent) of the utility officials responding
to this study indicated that substations only communicate with EMS and SCADA
systems. An additional 35 percent mentioned feeder IEDs, followed by protection
engineering groups (27 percent) and load management or demand side management
systems (20 percent). In terms of future plans, the most important new addition
is likely to be the inclusion of trouble call management systems to communicate
with substation equipment, as was indicated by 35 percent of those citing plans
to add links.
Another interesting topic concerned the importance of certain measurements
used to determine power quality at the substation level. Included in the list
were: harmonic power flow, total harmonics, odd harmonics, even harmonics,
min/max volts, system frequency, percent THD on current and on voltage, voltage
transients, flicker, and voltage sags and swells.
A total of 116 utility officials responded to this question. On a global basis,
respondents specified that voltages sags and swells was the most important
measurement of power quality at the substation level, mentioned by 68 percent.
This was followed closely by min/max volts (66 percent) and voltage transients
(61 percent). See Figure 1.
Key measurements for the overall group of 69 North American respondents
included sags and swells (77 percent), voltage transients (67 percent), and
min/max volts (59 percent). Co-ops added flicker (61 percent).
Key measurements for the overall group of 47 international utilities included
min/max volts (77 percent), system frequency (68 percent), along with voltage
sags and swells (55 percent), and voltage transients (53 percent). European
officials were particularly strong users of min/max voltage measurements, as
were utilities in the African and Middle Eastern regions.

For additional information and pricing on this new series of reports, please
call Newton-Evans at 1-800-222-2856 (internationally, 1-410-465-7316) or visit
our website at www.newton-evans.com.
Chuck Newton is Scheduled Speaker at DistribuTECH:
EUROPE 2000
DistribuTECH's DA/DSM Europe 2000 Conference will be held from October 10 -12
in Vienna, Austria. Chuck Newton will speak on "Substation Automation and
Integration Programs: World Outlook for 2000 - 2004." Copies of Chuck
Newton's speech are available upon request.
Upcoming Newton-Evans Research Report Series
Since 1978, 30 public studies of utility-related control systems, as well as
more than 150 commissioned utility industry product and market studies, have
been completed by Newton-Evans Research. During the remainder of 2000 and into
year 2001, our research firm will be conducting three new multiclient studies in
the utility sphere.
In fourth quarter 2000, we will be conducting a worldwide study of EMS/SCADA
usage and trends in electric utilities. This will be Newton-Evans third series
of worldwide reports in this area undertaken since 1996.
Another area of focus in the final months of 2000 concerns the world's market
for ISO and automated power exchange systems.
Information technology trends in electric, gas and water utilities will be
the main focal point for a report series beginning in first quarter 2001.
Cinergy's Business Process Transformation
In late 1999, Dale Justis, retired general manager of customer operations at
Cinergy and an active participant on the Edison Electric Institute's Customer
Operations workforce, spoke with Chuck Newton and Rick Bush, chief editor of
T&D World, during the Partnering Conference held by Transmission &
Distribution World magazine. Mr. Justis was a leading figure in shaping the
transformation of Cinergy's customer-impinging activities in this era of
profound change affecting the electric power delivery industry. This change has
affected Cinergy as much as any single company in the industry.
Unlike some investor-owned utilities, Cinergy had done its re-engineering
first, and only thereafter did it attempt to apply technology to the
reconfigured, scaled-down utility organization. According to Dale, the biggest
and most significant technology change within the company has taken place within
the operations side of the business. In Dale's words, the corporate change was
profound and permanent. "We went from an engineering centered business to a
customer focused organization in a matter of months. The pace of change required
the project development team to interact closely with internal people (users).
The impact this change in systems development efforts has had on our customers
is enormous. There is much more consistency in service provision and in customer
responses today than ever before at Cinergy, as a direct result of the work
effort which necessarily included cutting across several operating
utilities."
"When the company was formed there were three distinct business
processes for the traditional utilities that had been merged. There were over 90
systems just in Energy Delivery to deal with, and everything, the people, the
process and the technology needed to be changed. We had to become a single
corporation, we needed to improve productivity with a streamlined design
process, deploy enabling technology rapidly and set a foundation for the
evolving competitive environment."
Technology change occurred from top to bottom within the utility enterprise.
Cinergy began to work hand-in-hand with Convergent Group to re-engineer the IT
efforts within the company. This partnership has been successful for the
company. Some of the benefits of this partnership include operations department
successes. Re-engineering efforts involved the development of technical and
operating standards for use by all utilities merged into Cinergy. Design and
procurement standards were put in place as well. In the operations area, live
line work is dispatched via on-board computer today. Workers can be dispatched
from home. Field work orders are processed remotely, via computer - from
issuance through to completion. One key issue for the partnership is the need to
accommodate ongoing change within the operating companies.
"In order for the partnering effort to make a difference in day-to-day
job performance, we need to maintain a close relationship with the various line
organizations. The importance of single source data has spread, where the field
engineer is the initiator of an order, performs updates and posts job status
directly, eliminating the need for manual work order closing. It is only within
the last ….36 months that IT has matured to the point that it can effectively
support these field processes." Dale iterated that a third-party integrator
equipped with a 'service' shop attitude and capability is the way to approach
these difficult IT transitions.
Putting the various software pieces together is the easy part of the job.
Managing change with the workforce is the more difficult part of implementing
technology advances in the form of these super systems. "Unifying a
company's workforce, pulling people into the effort who then form
multidepartment interdependent team is the objective. Making the people part of
the solution - pre-selling the change…helping people become empowered to see a
bigger role in their own job. This is especially critical in an organization
undergoing re-engineering and trying to do more with fewer human
resources."
As Dale indicated, "You have to acknowledge that the individual job is
actually becoming more complicated - a job that is not resolved with simple
keystrokes or with button pushing. Workers are becoming the process owner here….the
remaining job functions are absolutely becoming more critical."
The Role of the Internet and Extensible Systems at Cinergy
Mr. Justis insisted that the future of web-based systems is here today.
"Web-enabled systems will allow our end use customers to order and to
discontinue various services offered by the company. New technology tools are
available to help the company transform to an e-utility and cited the need to
exploit information to the advantage of the company and its customers."
Dale indicated that the web-based technology - in an Intranet form - is now
being used to provide internal operating units with real time information on
just about any aspect of operating conditions, especially vital for outage
management. At the same time, the Internet is becoming the key vehicle to keep
customers informed about the company and about customer operations.
According to Dale, extensibility (a term used in the interview) means that
the ability to duplicate the approach to work flow at Cinergy could be readily
adopted on a global basis, not just a national basis, should the company acquire
an international utility at some point. The current system is flexible enough to
permit another round of process re-engineering.
Customer Information Systems at Cinergy
Currently implemented CIS can be resurrected instead of pouring millions of
dollars and thousands of person-hours into new system efforts. This is an
especially important concern in today's environment, when future requirements
are still uncertain. In the future, Dale sees increased use of web-enabled
services coming to the forefront for the CIS area.
The downside of all this progress in the CIS arena, is the inability to any
longer share very much of what one company does with another industry supplier -
all because of increasingly open competition in the industry. Dale indicated
that there will continue to be communications among utilities regarding their
CIS efforts, but that these will become 'guarded' and information sharing among
utilities will be a lot less in the future, than was historically the case.
One-Half of Survey Respondents Indicate Current Use of Automated Approach to
Distribution System Management
Recently, Newton-Evans completed a proprietary study on distribution system
management, monitoring and control among 25 of the top 100 U.S. electric
utilities. Operations and engineering officials were interviewed in this
information-gathering project.
Fifty percent of those responding indicated that their utility was currently
using an automated approach to distribution system management. Of these,
one-third indicated use of home-grown approaches and the other two-third noted
that their utility have purchased packages. Twenty-one percent indicated there
were plans to use such an automated approach, and the remaining 29 percent noted
no plans in the near future. Refer to Figure 2.
The utility officials were also asked what types of distribution system
management information would they want to have available in an automated manner
at substation, feeder and customer premise levels.
Four specific types of information were listed on the survey, with space
provided to indicate any other type. The four listed were: metering, power
quality (outages, sags, swells, harmonics), waveform capture, and equipment
maintenance status.

Substation level - metering and power quality information led in mentions
among the types of information listed. Equipment maintenance status and waveform
capture were also fairly popular at the substation level.
Feeder level - One-half of the group wanted to have metering data, and
equipment maintenance status information. About one-third wanted power quality
information, but only 18 percent thought that waveform capture would be useful.
Customer premises level - nearly two-thirds of respondents indicated that
metering data was vital, while over one-half concurred that having power quality
data at the customer premises was important. One-third mentioned waveform
capture, and nearly one-quarter cited equipment maintenance.
Protective Relays - North American and European
Usage Patterns
One of the first Automation Perspective columns that Chuck Newton wrote for
Transmission & Distribution World magazine discussed the changing usage
patterns for protective relays, based on Newton-Evans' then current study of
utility protection and control staffs. Now, four years later, Chuck is
Automation Editor and once again talks about the relay marketplace and products.
As in the 1995 column, the pace of technology change has continued unabated
through mid 2000. While numerical or digital relays continue to make inroads in
every application area within the electric utilities of the world, and every
week seems to bring the announcement of a new digital relay product, the use of
electro-mechanical (e-m) relays is still extensive, and the purchase of new
electro-mechanical relays continues to account for significant levels of unit
purchases, and for 25 percent - 30 percent of dollar values.
In the most recent Newton-Evans' series of global protective relay usage
studies, there are a number of interesting findings to report. Some of these
topics are purchase plans, budget ranges, relay budget allocations, continuing
purchases of electro-mechanical relays, and the need for outside resources to
assist in protective relaying activities.
Relay Purchase Plans:
Surprisingly, similar average numbers of relays are planned for purchase for new
and retrofit applications by North American and European utilities. This extends
to many major types of relays, except units designed for distribution feeders.
In this latter category, Western European utilities have plans to purchase about
twice as many units per utility as do their North American counterparts.
Relay Budgets:
In the U.S., 18 percent of responding utilities indicated budget levels of at
least $500,000. This compares with only five percent of Canadian utilities and
three percent of Eastern European utilities. However, 50 percent of the Western
European utilities plan to spend at least this much for relays.
Relay Budget Allocations:
Not all the budget set aside for relays is spent on relay hardware procurement.
In North America and in Western Europe, less than one-half of the relay budget
is to be spent on hardware, compared with a 68 percent level in Eastern Europe,
including Russia and the CIS. Training accounts for about six to seven percent
of the overall budget in Western Europe and in North America.
While installation costs take up only eight percent of Eastern European
budget, they account for a much higher 26 percent in North America and 21
percent in Western Europe. Engineering services account for eight percent of the
Eastern European budget, and about 13-14 percent for both North America and
Western Europe. Other budgeted line items account for the remainder of the relay
budget, according to the more than 140 utilities that took part in this survey.
These "other" items can amount to quite an investment, and as
mentioned by some utilities, include site testing, drafting of schemes, and
panel fabrication costs. See Table 1.
Digital Relays …..Continuing to Increase Share of Total Relay
Installations:
Digital relays continue to account for a high percentage of all new relay
purchases, but by no means are electro-mechanical relays being cast aside. In
North America, electro-mechanical relays continue to account for 22 percent to
46 percent of new use purchases, depending upon application, while Eastern
European utilities are continuing to buy e-m relays almost exclusively. These
utilities are trying to upgrade older e-m installations with some (15 percent to
32 percent) digital units.
Growing Need for Outside Services Providers:
In North America, the most apparent needs for outside services are in the areas
of training, cited by 34 percent, and installation services (26 percent).
Western European utilities agreed - at higher percentages - with the need for
training and installation, but also were looking for help with commissioning (44
percent) and renovation and upgrade services (39 percent). Eastern European
utilities expressed nearly universal needs for relay setting studies and
training services (78 percent mentioned both), closely followed by protective
system design services (73 percent). See Table 2.
Table 1: Relay Budget Allocation Comparison
| Budget Item |
North America |
Western Europe |
Eastern Europe |
|
Relay Hardware |
47% |
46% |
68% |
|
Training Services |
6% |
7% |
10% |
|
Installation Services |
26% |
21% |
8% |
|
Engineering Services |
14% |
13% |
8% |
|
Other Services |
7% |
13% |
7% |
Table 2: Requirements for External Sources of Relay Services
|
Specific Service Requirement |
North America |
Western Europe |
Eastern Europe |
|
Setting Studies |
15% |
28% |
78% |
|
Commissioning |
15% |
44% |
5% |
|
Protective SystemDesign Assistance |
15% |
28% |
73% |
|
Installation |
26% |
61% |
|
|
Maintenance |
8% |
17% |
2% |
|
Testing |
10% |
17% |
|
|
Training |
34% |
50% |
78% |
|
Renovation/Upgrade |
16% |
39% |
20% |
Visit Our Newly Revamped Website
Please visit us at our newly revamped website, www.newton-evans.com and
provide us with some feedback on our new look, as well as any additional
information you would like to see available on the site. Our website contains
company information, technical articles, upcoming utility trade event listings,
and links to other related energy industry sites.
Business Partner
Relationship Developments
Newton-Evans has now established business partner centers in Argentina,
Russia, China, and Cyprus, thus expanding native language survey capabilities
when requested by clients. In a recent proprietary study, Newton-Evans
translated the survey into five languages (Chinese, Japanese, Spanish, Arabic,
and Portuguese), allowing for a more inclusive approach to survey research.
Newton-Evans has also recently conducted two energy-related market studies in
the Russian language.


Figure 4 and Figure 5 summarize these findings on the consideration of
retrofits of SCADA installations.
Consideration of Retrofits of SCADA Installations
by Gas & Oil Pipeline Operations
In July 2000, Newton-Evans published its three-volume report series entitled
The World Market for Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition Systems in Gas
& Oil Pipeline Operations: 2000 - 2004. This report series was prepared
based on primary research survey data collected from gas/oil pipeline
engineering and operations managers worldwide.
Volume I is the global summary of research findings based on 76 pipeline
operations worldwide. This total includes 37 U.S. pipeline companies and 39
pipeline officials representing 13 countries. Participating countries include:
Australia, Canada, Colombia, Hong Kong, Mozambique, Netherlands, Pakistan,
Puerto Rico, Romania, Russia, South Africa, Tanzania, and Uruguay.
Volume 2 includes profiles of more than 50 pipeline SCADA vendors and Volume
3 consists of the pipeline SCADA market analysis and forecast.
Respondents to the survey were asked if their company was currently
considering, or has considered, a retrofit to bring one or more of the company's
SCADA installation up to current technology. Just over one-half (53 percent)
indicated that they are currently considering such a system retrofit. Another 22
percent indicated that retrofits simply were not feasible for their
installations, and one-quarter of the group was uncertain about the merit of
retrofitting their SCADA system.
Respondents noting that their utility was considering retrofits were then
requested to indicate if their existing software functionality is good enough to
meet their current requirements. These officials were also to indicate if the
upgrade would be the master station software only, or would be upgraded to
master station hardware and software.
Sixty-three percent of the responding officials noted that their existing
software does not meet their current requirements. Fifty-eight percent noted
that they would consider upgrade to master station hardware and software, while
only five percent indicated that the upgrade would be to the master station
software only.
For pricing and additional information on this new series of reports, please
call Newton-Evans Research at 1-800-222-2856 (or internationally,
1-410-465-7316) or visit us on our website at www.newton-evans.com.
|